BRATEX INC.

   Nursing Homes Affiliated with BRATEX INC.

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that BRATEX INC. is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.

NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
St Joseph Continuing Care Center Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 130 MONROE, LA Ranking: #17 out of 18 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

   Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with BRATEX INC.

Table below shows each skilled nursing home that BRATEX INC. was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.

Skilled Nursing Facility	Description
Cedar Ridge Inn Most Recent Record: 07/01/2023 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 101 FARMINGTON, NM Ranking: #4 out of 6 (Ranking List)
Magnolia Manor Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 88 GROVES, TX Ranking: #9 out of 18 (Ranking List)
Woodville Health and Rehabilitation Center Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 89 WOODVILLE, TX Ranking: #4 out of 4 (Ranking List)
Palma Real Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 90 MATHIS, TX Ranking: #2 out of 15 (Ranking List)
Mill Creek Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 68 SILSBEE, TX Ranking: #15 out of 17 (Ranking List)
Oakwood Manor Nursing Home Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 100 VIDOR, TX Ranking: #8 out of 23 (Ranking List)
The Manor at Seagoville Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 90 SEAGOVILLE, TX Ranking: #34 out of 109 (Ranking List)
Ashford Gardens Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 202 HOUSTON, TX Ranking: #84 out of 120 (Ranking List)
Renaissance Care Center Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 91 GAINESVILLE, TX Ranking: #9 out of 9 (Ranking List)
Laurel Court Most Recent Record: 07/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 125 ALVIN, TX Ranking: #48 out of 70 (Ranking List)
Beacon Hill Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 150 DENISON, TX Ranking: #5 out of 24 (Ranking List)
Larkspur Most Recent Record: 08/01/2014 Role: 5% or more ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 LUFKIN, TX Ranking: #11 out of 14 (Ranking List)
The Bradford at Brookside Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 125 LIVINGSTON, TX Ranking: #3 out of 6 (Ranking List)
Fort Bend Healthcare Center Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 56 ROSENBERG, TX Ranking: #24 out of 58 (Ranking List)
The Villa at Mountain View Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 DALLAS, TX Ranking: #41 out of 151 (Ranking List)
Crestview Court Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 125 CEDAR HILL, TX Ranking: #53 out of 137 (Ranking List)
The Madison On Marsh Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 125 CARROLLTON, TX Ranking: #21 out of 148 (Ranking List)
Prairie Estates Most Recent Record: 03/01/2016 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 180 FRISCO, TX Ranking: #63 out of 120 (Ranking List)
The Colonnades at Reflection Bay Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 180 PEARLAND, TX Ranking: #46 out of 100 (Ranking List)
The Belmont at Twin Creeks Most Recent Record: 12/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 112 ALLEN, TX Ranking: #27 out of 108 (Ranking List)
The Carlyle at Stonebridge Park Most Recent Record: 12/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest	No. of Beds: 112 SOUTHLAKE, TX Ranking: #82 out of 146 (Ranking List)
San Remo Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 112 RICHARDSON, TX Ranking: #16 out of 118 (Ranking List)
Solera at West Houston Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 112 HOUSTON, TX Ranking: #41 out of 88 (Ranking List)
The Harrison at Heritage Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 120 FORT WORTH, TX Ranking: #83 out of 118 (Ranking List)
The Crescent Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 112 SUGAR LAND, TX Ranking: #29 out of 84 (Ranking List)
Bel Air at Teravista Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 98 ROUND ROCK, TX Ranking: #17 out of 41 (Ranking List)
Coronado at Stone Oak Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 112 SAN ANTONIO, TX Ranking: #4 out of 81 (Ranking List)
The Broadmoor at Creekside Park Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 112 THE WOODLANDS, TX Ranking: #48 out of 54 (Ranking List)
Hollymead Most Recent Record: 06/01/2015 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 112 FLOWER MOUND, TX Ranking: #65 out of 141 (Ranking List)
Sorrento Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 112 SAN ANTONIO, TX Ranking: #41 out of 76 (Ranking List)
Windemere at Westover Hills Most Recent Record: 08/01/2017 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest	No. of Beds: 112 SAN ANTONIO, TX Ranking: #16 out of 78 (Ranking List)

Skilled nursing homes with the red icon () are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.

  About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database

Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.

The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:

• 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
• 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
• DIRECTOR
• MANAGING EMPLOYEE
• OFFICER
• OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
• PARTNERSHIP INTEREST

The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.